How to Turn Thermometers into Thermostats

Take away from me the noise of your songs; to the melody of your harps I will not listen. But let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream. (Amo 5:23-24)

Thermostat_Temperature_ThermometerAs we consider our mission as Christian school teachers and leaders, and reflecting on the BCS Mission “to… equip each student to glorify God by responsible action in contemporary society” the question arises, “are our students thermometers of culture or thermostats?”  I fear that too many of our students (a nd too many of us) are thermometers, merely reflecting the moral temperature of our culture rather than changing it.

You are the salt of the earth, but if salt has lost its taste, how shall its saltiness be restored? It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trampled under people's feet. You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden. Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.  (Mat 5:13-16)

Reflecting on the compelling need by God’s grace to help our students become thermometers rather than thermostats, I am reminded of Martin Luther King Jr.’s words in his Letter from Birmingham Jail:

There was a time when the church was very powerful--in the time when the early Christians rejoiced at being deemed worthy to suffer for what they believed. In those days the church was not merely a thermometer that recorded the ideas and principles of popular opinion; it was a thermostat that transformed the mores of society. Whenever the early Christians entered a town, the people in power became disturbed and immediately sought to convict the Christians for being "disturbers of the peace" and "outside agitators"' But the Christians pressed on, in the conviction that they were "a colony of heaven," called to obey God rather than man. Small in number, they were big in commitment. They were too God-intoxicated to be "astronomically intimidated." By their effort and example they brought an end to such ancient evils as infanticide and gladiatorial contests…

How do we help our students/children become thermostats rather than mere thermometers?

1) PRAY—only God can change minds and hearts: “So neither he who plants nor he who waters is anything, but only God who gives the growth.” (1Co 3:7)

2) Study God’s word as we cannot be holy vessels without it and we cannot give what we do not possess: “Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth.” (Joh 17:17); “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.” (Rom 12:2)

3) Be relevant—meet students where they are and then, in love, share the application of God’s word with them—but not always didactically.  Have your students wrestle with current and difficult political, scientific, moral issues—don’t spoon feed—teach them how to cook and how to eat, using God’s word as the recipe.

4) Be steadfast and patient—“ And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up. So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to those who are of the household of faith.” (Gal 6:9-10)  “Be patient, therefore, brothers, until the coming of the Lord. See how the farmer waits for the precious fruit of the earth, being patient about it, until it receives the early and the late rains.” (Jas 5:7)

It seems wholly appropriate on MLKJ Day to reread Martin Luther King Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail.  Setting aside any and all political considerations, there is much to commend this letter.  I recommend that you reread it in its entirety if you have not done so recently.

What Does “Turkey” Mean?

Dr. Barrett Mosbacker, PublisherThe following is an email that I recently sent to our staff and parents.  I am sharing this devotional on The Christian School Journal because you may want to submit your own acrostic, but I will not give you pizza! :-)   You may also want to consider something similar for your school.

Dear Staff and Parents,

Last week I had the privilege of attending our fourth grade Thanksgiving program, The Purpose of Thanksgiving.  It was a beautiful program and the children were wonderful.  We have some great talent heading to the South Campus!

As I watched and listened, I was again reminded that we are to walk through this life with its peaks and its valleys with a grateful heart.  One of the songs the children sang was Give Thanks with a Grateful Heart

Give thanks with a grateful heart
Give thanks unto the Holy One
Give thanks because He's given Jesus Christ, His Son
Give thanks with a grateful heart
Give thanks unto the Holy One
Give thanks because He's given Jesus Christ, His Son

And now let the weak say, "I am strong"
Let the poor say, "I am rich
Because of what the Lord has done for us"
And now let the weak say, "I am strong"
Let the poor say, "I am rich
Because of what the Lord has done for us"

The Challenge—You Must Hurry!

This beautiful song got me to thinking about Thanksgiving and how our culture demeans the holiday when referring to it as “Turkey Day.”  I do not like the phrase “Turkey Day” because it distorts the purpose and meaning of Thanksgiving.  “Turkey Day” turns our attention away from God and toward our appetites. 

Seeking to refocus our hearts and minds on thankfulness, I have created a simple acrostic from the word Turkey:

Thankful

Under all circumstances

Remembering God’s goodness and

Keeping his praise on our lips as we

Enjoy Him and his blessings every

Year

I bet our students can do much better than the Superintendent!  Here is a challenge!

Take a few minutes in your classes to have your students (individually or as a class effort—see below) create an acrostic for the word Turkey that communicates something about thankfulness from a biblical perspective.  Here is a website that you can use on your SMART Boards: http://www.enchantedlearning.com/poetry/acrostic/turkey/index.shtml

This challenge has both spiritual and academic merit! 

The Rules:

Early Childhood and Elementary

· To be fair to all students—all EC and Elementary classes must participate

· Every class is to submit an entry either as a class project or as individual student entries from the class.  I recommend that this be a class project as a part of reading, literature, or Bible instruction for EC and Elementary classes.

· The acrostic must be submitted to the Superintendent by the close of school this Tuesday!

· Submissions must include the student’s and teacher’s name and grade (if this was done as an individual effort) or the class grade and teacher’s name if done as a class effort. 

· To protect class time and to be equitable, no more than 15 to 30 minutes should be devoted to this challenge.

· Entries are to be submitted by email.  This means that for younger children, teachers will need to type the acrostic for their student or class and email them to the Superintendent.

· Entries from students or classes must be submitted to the Superintendent by the teacher, not by students.

· Only the acrostic will be considered.  Art work, etc., will not be considered.

· The winning entries will be determined by votes from the principals and Superintendent.

· If an individual student submission wins, his or her class will win free pizza.  The same applies if the winning entry is submitted by a class.

· Employees and their families are not eligible.  :-)

Junior and Senior High

· Due to the complexity involved on the Jr. and Sr. high campuses (e.g., we do not want this project done for each class period), only individual student entries will be considered.  Class entries will not be considered.  However, teachers may, if they elect, set aside time in their classes (from 15-30 minutes) for students to work individually on their acrostics during class time.  This may be an excellent exercise for study halls or English/Literature classes.

· I ask that each teacher explain this challenge to his or her classes and then encourage students to submit entries by emailing them to a Jr. or Sr. high teacher who will then email the entries to the Superintendent.  All entries must include the student’s name and the class/subject, class period, and teacher’s name that the student wants the entry to be considered for.  For example, “Mrs. Suzie Smith, 7th period history, Mr. ‘s class”

· Entries are to be submitted by email.

· Entries from students must be submitted to the Superintendent by the teacher, not by students.

· The acrostic must be submitted to the Superintendent by the close of school this Tuesday!

· Only the acrostic will be considered.  Art work, etc., will not be considered.

· The winning entries will be determined by votes from the principals and Superintendent.

· If an individual student submission wins, the class that he or she designates on the submission will win free pizza.  Remember, in order for a class to be awarded pizza, the winning entry must include the student’s name, class/subject, period, and teacher’s name that the student wants the entry to be submitted for.  For example, “Mrs. Suzie Smith, 7th period history, Mr. ‘s class”

· Employees and their families are not eligible.  :-)

The Reward:

Free pizza will be provided by the Superintendent.  Pizza will be awarded to one class for each division of the school (EC, EL, Jr. H., and H.S.) and the winning entries will be published in the next issue of The Roar!  The date for awarding the pizza to the classes will be determined in consultation with the classroom teachers, principals, and the Superintendent.

Final Thoughts:

Let’s not make this more complicated than necessary.  Let’s make this fun, creative, and a spiritual activity in the lives of our students.  If I have not anticipated every possible complication and inadvertently created a problem, please forgive me, granting the judgment of charity (I mean well), and work around it. :-)

I’m looking forward to seeing our students’ creativity!  Who knows, if an acrostic is good enough it may go viral and be a blessing to many others!

Is It Christian or Worldly to be World-Class?

Dr. Barrett Mosbacker, PublisherI had the privilege of traveling to Australia and to China this summer. My trip to China was to develop relationships with school and government officials for establishing an academic and cultural connection between a Chinese high school and our new online Chinese class. The trip was also designed to lay the foundation for a possible student and/or faculty exchange program. The trip exceeded my expectations resulting in a partnership with a large Chinese high school and bringing a Chinese student to BCS to complete his last two years of high school.

I was also invited to Australia to speak to a Christian School Conference on the topic of “Building World Class Christian Schools.” This was timely because I have touched upon the subject from time-to-time in previous presentations and writings.

As I considered this topic, several questions came to mind:

  • What is world-class? Is it a cliché?
  • Should Christian schools strive to be world-class or are we merely accommodating the world?
  • Is seeking to be world-class elitist and prideful or can it be honoring to the Lord?
  • What would a world-class, Christ-honoring, Christian school look like?

These are important questions. On the one hand, we must always be vigilant not to mimic the world or adopt unbiblical values and perspectives. On the other hand, we are called as stewards to prepare our students to serve Christ in a global, technologically rich, interconnected world.

I believe we should and can build Christ-honoring world-class Christian schools but only if we carefully define what we mean by world-class. And I believe that this can be achieved by small and large Christian schools alike.

The dictionary defines world-class as “ranked among the best or most prominent in the world; of the highest order.” I offer for consideration a definition that significantly alters and expands the traditional definition of world-class making it far more biblical and practical.

A world-class Christian school is one that is used by Christ to change lives, its community, and its culture by virtue of its commitment to the preeminence of Christ as reflected in the development of the Christian mind and character of its students and in its establishment of superior standards in teaching and learning so that the school is a model of best practices throughout the world.[1]

A world-class, Christ-honoring, Christian imageschool requires a combination of traits and practices that are so unique, so “otherly worldly” that they are in a class by themselves—not by virtue of what we are against but by what we are for and by virtue of a quality that transcends the normal.

There are eight traits that we should cultivate in the pursuit of world-class quality. We should strive to be world-class in:

  • Character
  • The Content and Quality of our Instruction
  • Being Culturally Relevant
  •  Our Caring
  • Our Courage
  • Fostering Curiosity
  • Our Being Champions of Excellence, and
  • Our Commitment to the Preeminence of Christ.

World-Class Character

Ideas have consequences. One of the best ways to promote Christian ideas—biblical truth—is to get students and others to ask questions. People ask questions when they are curious. People are curious when they are seeking closure—trying to connect dots.

People ask questions because they are curious or in an effort to bring harmony to emotional, spiritual, or what psychologists call cognitive dissonance. There is a tension and people seek answers and closure to relieve the tension.

Peter admonishes us to “always be prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you.” But, we often take this verse out of context. Why was the question being asked in the first place?

It is because the Christians, who were suffering under Nero, were responding in a very peculiar way—instead of whining and feeling sorry for themselves, they were simultaneously grieving yet “rejoicing.”

(6) In this you rejoice, though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been grieved by various trials … (8) Though you have not seen him, you love him. Though you do not now see him, you believe in him and rejoice with joy that is inexpressible and filled with glory. (I Peter 1)

This was very unusual—they were not acting like everyone else—they were “otherly worldly”. They were able to rejoice even in the midst of dreadful circumstances—they could rejoice while crying. They, like Paul, could sing hymns while chained to Roman guards.

Those around them wanted to know “How can this be?” “How can these Christians respond this way when they are losing their jobs, their property, when they are being made fun of and slandered—even tortured and killed?

It was the uniqueness, the quality, the transcendent nature of the believers’ character and behavior—under great distress and duress—that prompted the questions and the openness to the Gospel. In other words, they were different and in being different—in being a peculiar people—they made a difference.

That is our call and our challenge. We will not change the lives of our students or the lives of our parents, let alone the community and world around us, unless we are fundamentally different—not legalists, not separatists, not kill joys—but different in our response to the issues of life—both the good and the bad.

The greatest lessons we ever teach are not spoken—they are lived. Ideas matter. Ideas have consequences but it is the character of our lives that open the door for a discussion of the ideas—of truth.

Go back for a moment in your mind’s eye. Jesus tells a small group of men standing on the hillside that they are the salt and light to the world. Most of these men were not great men of learning; they were not professors or teachers. In fact, it is quite possible that many of them did not do particularly well in school, which may explain why some of them are fishermen and tax collectors!

So how is it that they would be the Lights of the World? Obviously the direct application has to do with sharing the Gospel but there is actually a broader definition at work.

If you examine the full context of Jesus’ sermon, you realize that they were to be the light of the world—not merely because of what they would teach and preach-but because of what they would become by God’s grace. Consider the before and after context:

Before his statement about them being the Light of the World, he preached The Beatitudes (Mat 5:3-11):

(3) "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

(4) "Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.

(5) "Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

(6) "Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.

(7) "Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.

(8) "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.

(9) "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

(10) "Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

(11) "Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account.

After telling them that they were to be the light and salt of the world, he describes how (Mat 5:21-48):

(21) "You have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.' (22) But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment …

(27) "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall not commit adultery.' (28) But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

(33) "Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.' (34) But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all … (37) Let what you say be simply 'Yes' or 'No'; anything more than this comes from evil.

(38) "You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.' (39) But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.

(43) "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' (44) But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, (45)

And so on……

This demonstration of Godly character is counter-cultural, this is a much higher standard—this in a sense is world-class—in a class by itself—transcending cultural norms and cultural expectations.

We reflect this character in how we deal with personal challenges—physical, family, and financial. It is reflected in how we respond to an angry email or to the apathetic student.

It is our character that makes our message believable, that gives it credibility.

To be a Christian world-class school means that our character sets us apart from the pack; to be among best in world: ranked among the best or most prominent in the world, of the highest order—World-Class character.

World-Class Content, Curriculum, Instruction, and Standards

This leads to the second point, to be world-class means that we are to be fully committed to truth.

In one way—only Christian schools can be truly world-class because—if we are faithful to god’s word and to careful Christian scholarship—we are the only ones who teach the whole truth.

Don’t misunderstand—many unbelievers have, by common grace, much truth. And, many Christian are wrong about a great many things. But, Christians who are careful with God’s word and are careful students and teachers are able to be the light of the world because they have the whole truth—not mere fragments or distortions of it.

Psalm 19 declares:

(2) Day to day pours out speech, and night to night reveals knowledge. (3) There is no speech, or are there words, whose voice is not heard. (4) Their voice goes out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them he has set a tent for the sun … (Natural Revelation)

(7) The law of the LORD is perfect, reviving the soul; the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple; (8) the precepts of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart; the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes; (Special Revelation)

Ultimately—the Word and the World are united in Christ in whom “we live and move and have our being.” To quote Dr. Poythress (Harvard Mathematician, Professor of NT, Westminster):

All scientists-including agnostics and atheists-believe in God. They have to in order to do their work … A Hindu philosopher may say that the world is an illusion. But he does not casually walk into the street in front of an oncoming bus. Sue, a radical relativist, may say that there is no truth. But she travels calmly at 30,000 feet on a plane whose safe flight depends on the unchangeable truths of aerodynamics and structural mechanics … scientists describe the regularities in God’s word governing the world.

So-called natural law is really the law of God or word of God, imperfectly and approximately described by human investigations … let us remember that we are speaking of real laws, not merely our human guesses and approximations. The real laws are in fact the word of God, specifying how the world of creatures is to function. So-called “law” is simply God speaking, God acting, God manifesting himself in time and space [Day-to-day pours forth speech]… what people call “scientific law’ is divine. We are speaking of God himself and his revelation of himself through his governance of the world … in thinking about law, scientists are thinking God’s thoughts after him.[2]

God has an opinion about everything…we are to seek to think about the world as God does. Let me give you an example. Francis Collins, —a world-class Christian scientist who takes both natural and spiritual revelation seriously—and whose Godly character has prompted many atheists to seek Christ because of his Christian response to his daughter’s rape, proclaimed in a speech to the world on the steps of the White House:

The human genome consists of all the DNA of our species, the hereditary code of life. This newly revealed text was 3 billion letters long, and written in a strange and cryptographic four-letter code. Such is the amazing complexity of the information carried within each cell of the human body, that a live reading of that code at a rate of one letter per second would take thirty-one years, even if reading continued day and night. Printing these letters out in regular font size on normal bond paper and binding them all together would result in a tower the height of the Washington Monument. For the first time on a warm summer day six months into the new millennium, this amazing script, carrying within it all of the instructions for building a human being, was available to the world …

Notice his words here:

… Without a doubt, this is the most important, most wondrous map ever produced by humankind…we are learning the language in which God created life. We are gaining ever more awe for the complexity, the beauty, and the wonder of God’s most divine and sacred gift …

… It’s a happy day for the world. It is humbling for me, and awe-inspiring, to realize that we have caught the first glimpse of our own instruction book, previously known only to God”[3]

Now that is being a light to the world. That is a reflection of the proper relationship of science and theology. That is a world-class Christian scientist! That reflects our spiritual and academic aspirations for our students!

World Class-Cultural Awareness and Relevance

David, after he had served the purpose of God in his own generation, fell asleep and was laid with his fathers. (Acts 13:36b)

Of Issachar, men who had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do. (1Chron. 12:32a)

These passages make a point of emphasizing that godly leaders, those that God uses to shape their institutions, schools, communities and countries, understand their times—they are relevant and contemporary and they knew how to lead and to apply biblical principles to the contemporary context.

A world-class Christian school is relevant—its teachers and administrators are current, aware, globally informed and may I even suggest, “Withit”?

To borrow a phrase from someone else, we cannot have Flintstone schools in a Jetson world.

We are entering the second decade of the 21st century. We must understand our times and cultures if we are to effectively prepare our students to serve Christ.

In many ways, it is the tale of two cities—the best of times and the worst of times—at once an unprecedented time of progress and an unprecedented time of distress.

Progress

  • The WSJ recently heralded a potential new era in biology, scientists for the first time have created a synthetic cell, completely controlled by man-made genetic instructions.
  • We are in the midst of a third industrial revolution: Microelectronics, Computers, Robotics, Human Genome, Biotechnology, New materials, and Telecommunications.
  • The top 10 in-demand jobs in 2010 did not exist in 2004.
  • More than 3000 books are published every day.
  • In 2008, the amount of new technical information was doubling every two years. This year, 2010, it is projected to double every 72 hours!
  • Immediate access to vast amounts of information and communication: we carry a world of knowledge in our pockets!
  • There has been some progress in some cultures dealing with racial, political, and socio-economic discrimination.
  • The human race is more productive than at any time in human history.
  • More people have access to better health care than at any time in history.
  • Generally speaking, we are far more sensitive to environmental concerns than in past generations.
  • The educational opportunities available in the world are advancing rapidly enable giving more people greater access to education and a better future.

Distress

  • We live in a very violent time. More people were killed by war and their governments in the 20th century than in all human history combined. Local, regional, and international wars continue to increase.
  • Fanaticism of all sorts too often results in the killing of innocent men and women.
  • Many of the world’s economies are sinking under unsustainable debt.
  • It is increasingly difficult for the undereducated to find permanent employment to care for themselves and their families.
  • The deviate and perverted are celebrated as good while the natural and holy are condemned as evil.

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! (Isa 5:20)

  • Materialism and sensuality are rampant.
  • Relativism and post-modernism are the reigning worldviews of our time.

These are our times-this is the world that our students are entering and in which they must provide leadership. It is a world of unprecedented opportunities and challenges!

We cannot do business as usual. We must engage with how things are, not how they were or how we wish them to be.

There is great value in tradition; there is great value in our heritage as Christians, and as Americans. But the value is not in the traditions themselves-it is in the principles and lessons learned that can be applied in new and creative ways to our contemporary context so that like the men of Issachar, men who had “understanding of the times to know what Israel ought to do,” we understand our times and know what do to—how to teach and how to lead.

I want to emphasize that while our methods may and often must change, e.g., through the application of neuroscience, technology, creative assessment techniques, and so forth, our commitment to God’s word is immutable.

World-Class Caring

We cannot and will not meet the challenges of the 21st century and of our students unless we care. We cannot be a city on the hill; we cannot be the light of the world, unless we love our neighbors as ourselves, unless we sacrifice ourselves for our students and our parents, even or especially the ones that we find it hard to like.

One of the primary ways we let our light shine is through our good works, a reflection of our love and concern for others: “let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father.”

  • Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. (Php 2:5-8)
  • You call me Teacher and Lord, and you are right, for so I am. If I then, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another's feet. For I have given you an example, that you also should do just as I have done to you. Truly, truly, I say to you, a servant is not greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him. If you know these things, blessed are you if you do them. (Joh 13:13-17)
  • A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." (Joh 13:34-35)

In other words, people are more important than tasks. Administrators lead people not employees, teachers teach students, not subjects!

To be world-class Christian schools means that we love and serve our students, we do not merely teach them. Sometimes this requires tough love but it always requires love. Paul makes the point as powerfully as it can be made: “If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.” (I Cor. 13:1)

To be world-class our love, our devotion, and our sacrifice for and service to our students must be ranked among best in world: ranked among the best or most prominent in the world—of the highest order.

There should never be an instance when an unbelieving teacher, administrator, or coach is more caring, more loving, and more sacrificial in the care and teaching of his or her students than a believer!

World-Class in Courage

To be world-class takes courage.

  • It takes courage to speak the truth.
  • It takes courage to insist and to model excellence—it takes courage to refuse the mass current of mediocrity—to swim against the current.
  • It takes courage to give an honest, rather than a safe grade.
  • It takes courage to tell a parent that his/her son is not doing well, is not working hard.
  • It takes courage to tell a teacher that he/she is coasting.
  • It takes courage to tell an administrator that he or she is not providing visionary, strategic, effective leadership.
  • It takes courage to try new things, to experiment, to get beyond our comfort zones and our routines.
  • It takes courage to go beyond tradition and beyond what we have always done.

Without the courage to speak the truth in love, without the courage to experiment, without the courage to break out of the ordinary and to help our students do likewise, we cannot be world-class.

World-Class in Curiosity

We cannot shine if we are dull. We cannot be lights to our students if we have stopped learning. We cannot ignite a heart and mind of curiosity if we have lost ours—the student will be like his teacher—we cannot give what we do not possess.

Are we reading outside our professional field? Are we learning about new discoveries? Do we read those with whom we disagree? Are we learning new skills? Is there any venturesomeness about us? Or have we become stale, provincial, sheltered, and comfortable? Are we routine?

Curiosity is the very essence of Christian education because it is embedded in us as image bearers, it is the catalyst for the cultural mandate—to exercise dominion and stewardship over creation—and is it what propels us to investigate and to learn, to develop new tools and new methods.

Paul Marshall, in his wonderful book titled: Heaven in Not My Home[4], writes:

Many of those who denounce technology have no real desire to live in some primitive civilization. Instead, many of them sit amidst the fruits of technical progress all the while denouncing the technology that brought them. Technology, properly used, is a gift from God.

The topic of technique and technology preoccupies today’s world. Technique refers to “how to” do something—it is the science of “how.” It encompasses all that we can do—from going to the moon to public speaking, from designing nuclear bombs to making love, from serving a hungry neighbor to writing books. All of these are included when we talk about technique.

Along with technique comes technology, which is the made, created, embodied structure of technique. Technology includes, in one form or another, all those things that do not naturally occur, all those things that we shape and reshape. Technology infuses art as much as physics, families as much as engineering. To talk about technique and technology is to talk in one particular way about all of human life, as all of human life has some technical aspect. Responsible technical skill is both a gift and a calling. It is the human task of reshaping the materials of God’s world in new ways. It is imagination and skill in the service of usefulness.

Nor is our task in the world simply following the clear rules that God has set down, though we must certainly follow God’s commandments and learn from the creation itself. We have a creative task in the world. We must shape things in ways for which there is sometimes no clear direction. This is why imagination is not just a feature of the arts; it is a feature of human life itself. Without imagination, without experimentation, without openness to new questions and new possibilities, there can be no science and no technology. We are not challenging God when we do this, at least not when we do it in humility and faith. We are not stealing fire from the gods. We are taking up our responsibility before God to shape what he has placed in our hands.

Christian education is the exploration of God’s mind as revealed in creation! Christian education is preparing students to use their skills, their imaginations, and their curiosity to shape the world and to build God honoring culture. That is a wondrously beautiful and infinitely deep mission!

On a building at Harvard is the following inscription: “Students explore the mind of God for the art of life.” Let that sink in. “Students explore the mind of God for the art of life.” I often include this quote in my email signature line because I believe that if one takes time to mediate on it that it has profound implications for Christian education. The Psalmist writes:

Great are the works of the Lord; they are studied by all who delight in them. (Psalm 111:2)

  • When our students look into a microscope, they are peering into the mind of God.
  • When they gaze through a telescope, they are encountering the creation of an incomprehensible, infinite intelligence.
  • When they listen to music, they are experiencing the beauty and harmony of God’s character.
  • When they study mathematics, they are, to quote Edward Everett, a former president of Harvard:

Contemplating truths, which existed in the divine mind before the morning stars sang together, and which will continue to exist there, when the last of the radiant host shall have fallen from heaven.” Mathematics reflects the sustaining power of the Word of God.

  • In the study of history they are investigating the sovereignty and providence of God as worked out in time and space:

And x[God] made from one man every nation of mankind to live yon all the face of the earth, zhaving determined allotted periods and athe boundaries of their dwelling place, 27 bthat they should seek God, in the hope that cthey might feel their way toward him and find him. dYet he is actually not far from each one of us, [5]

This is inexhaustible! Do we FEEL the wonder in what we teach and why we lead? Are we passionate about plunging into the depths of God’s infinite, beautiful mind as we explore this world and the universe?

Is that what you are experiencing? Is this what our students are experiencing in our classrooms? Do they leave our classrooms awestruck at who God is and what he has done? Do they leave Chemistry class a better person for having encountered Christ in chemistry?

Fostering curiosity like this will produce world-class teachers, students, and schools!

World-Class Champions of Excellence

We are to be champions in the quality of our own work and in our work-ethic. Champions, by definition, are world-class. I immediately think of Olympic champions or the World-Cup. These athletes are the best in the world.

As Christian school teachers and leaders, we should seek to be the best in the world, to have the best schools in the world—not for our glory but that men may see our “good works” and glorify our father in heaven.

This is not a matter of pride. Since we are to “do everything as unto Christ” and since Christ is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, and since one day we must give an account for our work on this earth, how can we strive for anything less?

  • How can we serve up a warmed over lesson plan? Would you serve Christ leftovers if he came over for dinner? Why then would we serve his children left-over lessons or left-over leadership? Jesus said “as you did it to one of the least of these dmy brothers,6 you did it to me.”
  • How can school administrators provide mediocre leadership?
  • How can we fail to walk that extra mile for a student or parent (even the ones we don’t particularly like) when Jesus tells us to willingly walk an extra-mile for a Roman soldier who has occupied your country, steals your wealth through unfair taxation, who may be the very soldier who will crucify Jesus, and who may serve Nero in torturing Christians to death? How can we do less for our students and parents? How can we do less for each other?
  • How can we be satisfied to provide our students an education, that while ranking high in the U.S., may in fact be in the middle of the pack or lower when measured against international standards?

We are to be the beacon of light on the hill of excellence—drawing unbelievers to our schools to learn from us!

We are to be Champions in the quality of everything that we do: ranked among best in world: ranked among the best or most prominent in the world, of an international standard of excellence; of the highest order—not for our glory but the glory and honor of Christ.

World-Class Commitment to the Preeminence of Christ

This work is not about us. The work we do in our Christian schools is about the Kingdom of God—it is that simple and that profound. Jesus is The Alpha and the Omega of Creation and he is the Alpha and Omega of our work and our schools!

Being a world-class Christian school is a POSITIVE mission:

  • It is not about withdrawal, not about protecting, and not about sheltering; our call is about providing a positive imaginative, engaging vision of personal and cultural redemption and transformation under the Lordship of Christ.
  • It is not about what we are against as much as what we are for, what we are called to do as creative, relational, rational, redeemed image bearers.

Paul Marshall[6] makes the following observation and goes on to quote C.S. Lewis:

The major patterns of our culture and society are being shaped with almost no Christian presence. We live in a “subculture,” on our own island, increasingly far from shore.

And when we do seek influence, we often only react to someone else’s proposals. If the Disney Company puts out movies that trivialize or demonize the Christian faith, we boycott them. But this simply pulls us farther into our own shell. We have no alternative to put forward, no movies that undercut Disney because they’re better. A familiar proverb says, “The fool curses the darkness, but the wise man lights a candle.” We “curse” a lot but have few candles, and so the darkness deepens …

If Christian faith produces good families, good businesses, good art, good books, and good politics, then people will notice, and they will be intrigued. In American society, where people think they know all they want to know about Christianity, this is especially important. As usual, C. S. Lewis said it well:

I believe that any Christian who is qualified to write a good popular book on any science may do much more by that than by any directly apologetic (evangelistic) work…We can make people (often) attend to the Christian point of view for half an hour or so; but the moment they have gone away from our lecture or laid down our article, they are plunged back into a world where the opposite position is taken for granted…What we want is not more little books about Christianity, but more little books by Christians on other subjects—with their Christianity latent. You can see this most easily if you look at it the other way round. Our Faith is not very likely to be shaken by any book on Hinduism. But if whenever we read an elementary book on Geology, Botany, Politics, or Astronomy, we found that its implications were Hindu, that would shake us. It is not the books written in direct defense of Materialism that make the modern man a materialist; it is the materialistic assumptions in all the other books. In the same way, it is not books on Christianity that will really trouble him. But he would be troubled if, whenever he wanted a cheap popular introduction to some science, the best work on the market was always by a Christian.

  • It is about being empowered by God’s Spirit that God’s will be done on earth as it is in heaven. It is about leading, serving, changing, and creating under the Lord of Jesus Christ-our King and our Savior!
  • It is about being a city on the hill—a city of educational excellence that draws believer and unbeliever alike to our schools as models of character, caring, of contemporary instruction and learning, of curiosity as we explore the wonder of God’s world.
  • It is about the exaltation of Christ as He is seen and known in the Scriptures and in creation.

Conclusion—A Vision for the Future—Where in The World Are We Going?

We live in one of the most challenges times in human history and a time of nearly unparalleled opportunity. On the one hand, the world faces great challenges and threats; we live in a time when one small miscalculation, e.g., on the Korean Peninsula or in dealing with Iran, can erupt into a regional or world war with devastating consequences.

On the other hand, we live in a time when we are able to access and to disseminate information with unprecedented speed and ease. We can carry whole libraries in our pockets. With leadership, vision and the right tools, we can make our lessons available to most people on this planet!

There has seldom been a time when the light of God’s word was more needed or a time when there have been more competing false lights in the world.

As Christian school teachers and leaders, we are called to be lights on the hill, beacons of truth.

  • We must lead not follow, as individual Christian professionals and as a school!
  • We must set the standard, not rest with mediocrity the easy the familiar, the comfortable. We are called to be world-class—to rise above the norm—by being world-class in our Character, the Content of our Curriculum and Quality of our Instruction, Caring, Courage, Curiosity, in being Champions of Excellence, in our Commitment to the Preeminence of Christ.

Right Now Counts Forever

“Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more. (2) And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. (3) And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, "Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God. (4) He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away." (5) And he who was seated on the throne said, "Behold, I am making all things new." Also he said, "Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true." (6) And he said to me, "It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To the thirsty I will give from the spring of the water of life without payment. (7) The one who conquers will have this heritage, and I will be his God and he will be my son … (22) And I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb. (23) And the city has no need of sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and its lamp is the Lamb. (24) By its light will the nations walk, and the kings of the earth will bring their glory into it, (25) and its gates will never be shut by day--and there will be no night there. (26) They will bring into it the glory and the honor of the nations.” (Rev 21:1-7; 22-26)

That is our future—that is the future that we are preparing our students to inherent—a new heaven and a new earth in which men from every tribe, nation, and tongue build a new culture and a new civilization. The work begins now—with our students, in our classrooms, in our Christian schools! This is the end for which we work! This is world-class Christian education!


[1] © Copyrighted Barrett Mosbacker 2010

[2] Poythress, V. S. (2006). Redeeming science: A God-centered approach. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

[3] Dr. Francis Collins, A scientist presents evidence for belief: The language of God, (Free Press, New York), 2006, pp. 2-3

[4] Marshall, P. (1998). Heaven is not my home: Learning to live in God's creation

x x [Gen. 3:20; Mal. 2:10]

y y Gen. 11:8; Luke 21:35

z z [Job 12:23; 14:5]

a a Deut. 32:8; [Ps. 74:17]

b b [ch. 15:17]

c c [Job 23:3, 8, 9]

d d [Deut. 4:7; Ps. 145:18; Jer. 23:23, 24]; See ch. 14:17

[5] The Holy Bible : English standard version. 2001 (Ac 17:25–27). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.

d d ch. 28:10; John 20:17; Rom. 8:29; Heb. 2:11; [ch. 12:50]

6 6 Or brothers and sisters

[6] Marshall, P. (1998). Heaven is not my home: Learning to live in God's creation

College: Are Parents Getting Their Money’s Worth? Are They Getting “More” Than They Bargained For?

By Jeff Myers

This fall about two million American students will leave for college for the first time to receive an education at a yearly cost of $12,000 a year for a public university and up to $50,000 for a private one. Scholarships and grants reduce the cost for most families, but still, the Wall Street Journal reports that the average student leaves college with $23,186 in debt.

The total cost for this transaction is somewhere between 25 and 40 billion dollars. Per year.

Oh well, at least families are getting their money's worth.

Or not.

A recent study confirms what many parents have long suspected, that going to most colleges can make kids forget the things that are important and embrace values that are counter to what they learned growing up.

Before I share this study's results, let me say this to parents: leftist professors don't feel sorry for you. As far as they’re concerned, you’ve been oppressing the masses to get that money anyway, so it’s deliciously ironic that you not only turn your children over to the indoctrinators, but that you fork over 50k to 200k for the privilege.

Don't take my word for it. Here's what the late Richard Rorty, one of the most prominent philosophers of the 20th century, said on the subject:

"... I, like most Americans who teach humanities or social science in colleges and universities ... try to arrange things so that students who enter as bigoted, homophobic, religious fundamentalists will leave college with views more like our own ...  The fundamentalist parents of our fundamentalist students think that the entire ‘American liberal establishment’ is engaged in a conspiracy. The parents have a point...we are going to go right on trying to discredit you in the eyes of your children, trying to strip your fundamentalist religious community of dignity, trying to make your views seem silly rather than discussable. We are not so inclusivist as to tolerate intolerance such as yours ... I think those students are lucky to find themselves under the benevolent Herrschaft [domination] of people like me, and to have escaped the grip of their frightening, vicious, dangerous parents ..." [editor’s note: sorry for all the ellipses, but it's hard to summarize Rorty's windblown rhetoric].

When it comes to reshaping values, liberal universities know precisely what they’re doing. About four out of five students walk away from their Christian faith by the time they are in their twenties.

The Indoctrination Route: Citizenship--Bad; Leftist Politics--Good

In February the Intercollegiate Studies Institute released its annual report entitled, “The Shaping of the American Mind.” ISI researchers studied students' knowledge of basic citizenship questions, along with 39 issue-based propositions.

They found that college graduates are dangerously ignorant of basic civics. For example, fewer than one in two college graduates know that the phrase "We hold these truths to be self evident..." is from the Declaration of Independence (10% actually think it is from the Communist Manifesto).

When it comes to political radicalism, however, colleges pass with flying colors. Graduates are significantly MORE likely to believe in abortion on demand and same sex marriage, and significantly LESS likely to believe that the Bible is the word of God, that prayer should be allowed in schools, or that anyone can succeed in America with hard work and perseverance.

The Transformation Route: Being Caught Off Guard--Bad; Being Confidently Prepared--Good

Obviously not all colleges are destructive. There are even a handful of great ones (I would humbly suggest that the one I teach at--Bryan College--is one of the excellent few).

But most Christian parents feel hamstrung. They are concerned for their kids but also realize that with few exceptions (such as flat-out genius) most young people have no chance of attaining leadership positions without a college degree.

There is a solution and it is available now. Please, if you have a college-bound student, listen carefully to what I'm about to tell you. This is important even if your child is going to a "safe" college (some so-called "Christian" colleges are actually better at convincing kids to walk away from their faith than some secular colleges).

A two-week Summit Ministries course is a must. This summer. Find out more [here].

At Summit students ages 16-21 invest 12 days gaining the confidence they need to understand and defend an intelligent biblical worldview. They join a vast network of mentors whose books, writings and personal encouragement help sharpen them for life-long leadership. They stand shoulder to shoulder with newfound friends who help them stand strong.

Now Is Not The Time for Shortcuts

There is much at stake. Having your child read an apologetics book or go to a weekend conference is great, but it’s not the same as a two-week Summit experience, and here’s why:

1. At Summit students can ask questions as they arise. Over the course of 12 days students are able to form questions and interact with top Christian professors, mentors, and classmates. As they become comfortable, they open up in small groups, around the meal tables and in open forums with speakers. This gives students confidence that everyday people really can defend what they believe.

2. At Summit students enjoy being given the responsibility to think through issues as adults. Summit asks students to forsake adolescence and step up into mature adulthood. Over the course of 12 days they come to believe that it can actually be done.

3. Summit breaks the stranglehold of negative peer pressure. Young adults will seldom attempt to become anything more than what their peers think they can be. Summit students learn how to reverse this pressure and support one another in successfully thinking and living Christianly.

4. Summit provides personal contact with expert mentors. At Summit students spend 12 days with experts who have the depth of experience needed to delve deeply into the complex challenges they will face. These experts are specially selected based on their ability to communicate effectively with students.

5. At Summit, parents find that their parental role and their Christian values are affirmed and supported. Kids are always asking, "Who else says so besides mom and dad?" At Summit students are encouraged to honor their parents and be reconciled to them. This helps moms and dads strengthen their relationship before their sons and daughters leave for college, which is crucial.

Where Christian Leaders Send Their Own Children for Training

Summit is not a miracle cure. But for 47 years it's been a trusted source when it comes to preparing students to be the kind of leaders who shape culture, rather than who are shaped by it. That's why evangelical leaders such as James Dobson and Josh McDowell endorse it so enthusiastically. It's also why they chose to send their children to Summit before college; there simply is no substitute for the excellent training and mentoring Dr. Noebel and his staff provide.

I believe in the Summit. In fact I am planning to speak at every Summit Ministries session in the U.S. this summer in Colorado, Virginia, Tennessee and Wisconsin.

Summit enrollment is limited by space. Most sessions do fill up, but you can download an application [here]. Scholarships are available for those in financial need.

Remember: Before College, Summit. Please forward this to any parent who doesn’t yet understand this.

Dr. Jeff Myers is founder and president of Passing the Baton International. Jeff speaks to tens of thousands each year on worldview and leadership issues. This article was taken by permission from Jeff’s E-Newsletter “Get Ready to Lead.” To subscribe, please visit www.passingthebaton.org. For more information on Summit Ministries, please visit www.summit.org.

*Richard Rorty, "Universality and Truth," in Robert B. Brandom (ed.), Rorty and His Critics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), pp. 21-22.

**George Barna, "Twentysomethings struggle to find their lace in Christian churches"; Ken Ham and Britt Beemer, Already Gone: Why Your Kids Will Quit Church and What You Can Do to Stop It (Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 2009), p. 24.

The Web Equivalent of Nudists and Should You Commit Web 2.0 Suicide?; Is There a Biblical Framework on Privacy?

Happy Data Privacy Day Dr. Barrett Mosbacker, PublisherFacebook recently irked me.  I am a Facebook user but I am not a heavy user.  I keep up with a few colleagues and friends but mostly I post articles on Facebook that I believe others may find interesting.  I mostly use Facebook so that I can work through the biblical, educational, and social implications of social technologies as a Christian.  We are called to bring all of life under the Lordship of Christ—that includes Facebook and similar technologies. 

I also use Twitter (you can follow me @Bmosbacker).  I usually post an occasional link to an interesting article.  The exception is that I post my status as I travel.  My wife, children and secretary are able to keep up with me in real time and are immediately alerted if I have flight delays, etc. I also follow “Breaking News” the “CDC”, “TechCrunch”, AlertNet, and a few other organizations that provide timely and useful information. 

How did Facebook irk me?  The company changed its privacy settings to a default of “public”.  That meant that any information I posted on Facebook would be available to everyone on the Internet.  Facebook made this change because it is in the company’s interest to have as much information shared publically as possible. 

I have nothing to hide.  But I am very selective and careful about anything I put online.  I assume that anything I post could be made public.  Accordingly, I set virtually all of the privacy settings to the strictest level possible, exactly what Facebook prefer that I not do.

As an aside, if you want to commit Web 2.0 suicide, now you can.  This article explains what it is and how it is done.

Having just experienced Facebook’s effort to make our lives increasingly public, I found this particular article to be very timely: We All Live in Public Now. Get Used to It. Erick Schonfeld writes:

As the Web becomes more social, privacy becomes harder and harder to come by. People are over-sharing on Facebook and Twitter, broadcasting their whereabouts every ten steps on Foursquare and Gowalla, and uploading photos and videos of their most private imagemoments to the Web for all to see. It’s easy to say that privacy is dead, we all live in public now, and just deal with it.

But things are a bit more complicated. It used to be that we lived in private and chose to make parts of our lives public. Now that is being turned on its head. We live in public and choose what parts of our lives to keep private. Public is the new default.

Mr. Schonfeld goes on to quote Stowe Boyd:

Some people are the web equivalent of nudists: they live very open lives on the web, revealing the intimate details of their relationships, what they think of friends and co-workers, their interactions with family and authorities. But . . . even these apparently wide open web denizens may keep some things private, or secret.

As if to emphasize the point, one reader posted this comment to the article:

 My entire life is public! I use services like Foursquare and Twitter posting my location and pictures on my family and I.  I think people of my generation won’t care as much. It’s kind of second nature to me to just post everything I’m doing. I never really stopped to think about what I’m doing as being dangerous.  The future will be filled with people like me! :)

Thus the Question: Is There a Biblical Framework on Privacy?

I recognize that our country’s forefathers embedded certain notions of privacy in the Constitution and Bill of Rights but these do not directly address the development of a biblical framework for privacy on the Internet.  More specifically:

  • How does privacy apply to 21st century technology?
  • What should we be teaching students beyond being careful about what they post?  For example, is there a positive component to living a more public life online?  After all, if one grew-up in a very small village or town there is very little privacy as we typically conceive of it. 
  • Is individual privacy a human construct or a divine one? 
  • What are the limits? 
  • Is it sinful to post personal information on the internet that is not intrinsically evil?
  • What are the caveats and limits to privacy in the digital age?
  • How can we and our students use social networking in a redemptive manner, i.e., how can they use social networking in the normal course of living to glorify Christ (and I’m not referring to presenting the Gospel or apologetics—although that is certainly a good thing)? 

I have not formulated adequate answers to these questions yet (I’m working on it) but it seems to me that we have an obligation to grapple with these issues and to help our students do likewise.  We need to help them develop a biblical (not a traditional, conservative, or liberal) worldview on privacy and social media in the digital age.

What are your thoughts?  Please share you initial ideas by living a comment on this article or by posting your thoughts on the CSJ Facebook Discussion Board.

You Should Sign the Manhattan Declaration-But Be Careful!

ManhattanDeclaration_Logo If you have not read the Manhattan Declaration, I urge you to do so.  You can click this link The Manhattan Declaration to download a PDF version to read.  It is only nine pages long but well worth reading.  Click here to access the web site for more information and to sign the declaration.  Click here for a very informative FAQ document.

I urge you to sign the Declaration.  However, pray and think through this first.  It is very possible that by signing this Declaration you will increase the likelihood of personally, or the institution you represent, becoming the focus of verbal or legal harassment in the future.  Remember, what is posted on the Internet can ultimately become public.

Before you sign the Declaration, ask yourself this question, “Am I, by God’s grace, willing to pay a possible personal, family, or ministry price for publically supporting the principles outlined in the Declaration?” 

My prayer is that you will prayerfully sign the Declaration.  I also encourage you to pass this information on to others.

Finally, I believe you should consider having this document systematically discussed and analyzed in selected high school classes.  What a wonderful teaching opportunity—that deals with the Christian mind, heart, and will!

Ideas Have Histories: Where Postmodernism Came From-Part I

This is part one of two articles on Postmodernism

By John Stonestreet, Summit Ministries

Postmodernism comes in all kinds of shapes and expressions, and this sort of variety can make it difficult to understand. Further, postmodernism resists categories and distinctions, and this makes it more difficult to nail down as a worldview. There is a larger intellectual history that must be understood in order to grasp the uniqueness and significance of postmodernism as a worldview.

Ideas Have Histories: How We Lost Our Minds…

While dividing history into distinct time periods is not an exact science, there are two major historical transitions that can help us clarify the emergence of postmodernism: (1) the transition towards modernism, typically dated around the 1700s and (2) the transition away from modernism which began in the late 20th century.

The transition from what is often called the pre-modern period into the modern period corresponds with the influence of Enlightenment thinking and the scientific revolution. Prior to the Enlightenment, there was a dominant cultural belief in the existence of the supernatural. This was due in large part to the rise of Christianity and specifically the Roman Catholic church as the most powerful cultural presence in medieval times. This was a world of authority, and authority rested in the hands of traditional institutions, especially the church, since it was entrusted with interpreting and communicating this truth to the common person.

With a belief in God came a strong belief in the concept of revelation, that God not only existed but had revealed Himself and His will in the Bible. This revelation was considered the primary source of truth, and could be trusted to unlock God’s metanarrative (or, “Big Story”) for the world. Believing was the starting point of real knowledge. St. Anselm, typifies a pre-modern perspective on truth: “For I seek not to understand in order that I may believe; but I believe in order that I may understand, for I believe for this reason: that unless I believe, I cannot understand.” This view of revelation and authority did not fare well during the Enlightenment.

The Enlightenment was a movement among European intellectuals in the 17th and 18th centuries. In the decades leading up to this time, the church’s authority had been successfully challenged politically (reactions against corruption), theologically (Luther, Calvin and the Protestant Reformation), philosophically (downfall of scholasticism), and scientifically (Galileo, Copernicus, and Baconian method). There was a growing disillusionment with the traditional educational, political and religious institutions, as well as their authoritative sources.

During the Enlightenment, authority shifted from traditional institutions to human reason. A scientific approach to the world yielded tremendous advances in medicine, technology, and communications and challenged the centrality of theology and religious belief as the paradigm for learning. Free from the restrictive shackles of traditional beliefs (thus, modernism), progress seemed inevitable. Immanuel Kant described this period of time in this way: “Sapere aude! ‘Have the courage to make use of your own mind!’ is thus the slogan of the Enlightenment.”[1]

The modern period had begun. The growing skepticism in regards to anything supernatural was matched by growing faith in human ability to know the world, control it, and reap the inevitable benefits. The “Big Story” of the world was not given by revelation; rather, it was to be discovered and perhaps even determined by science, reason and technology. This major transition was at the heart of the modern period.

However, from our 21st century perspective, it is clear that the predictions of utopia guaranteed in the modern period never materialized. Instead, modernists became disillusioned as military increase brought world wars; failed development policies led to class oppression and colonialism; economic idealism resulted in communism and the Cold War; and our best science created nuclear weapons and the threat of global devastation.

Postmodern writers, beginning with Nietzsche, began to question the integrity of modernism’s metanarrative of progress. In fact, the main casualty of a postmodern perspective is the very idea of a metanarrative. Postmoderns are skeptical of any and all claims to an authoritative comprehensive worldview, absolute truth about reality, and an overarching purpose to the human story.[2] Postmoderns embrace local narratives, not metanarratives; a multitude of stories, not a “Big Story.”

In short, it could be said that religious metanarratives were dismissed by modernism. Man-made ones are dismissed by postmodernism. This is what Myron Penner and others have referred to as “the postmodern turn:”[3] postmodernism is a turn away from the certainty and optimism of modernism. As Jean Francios Lyotard wrote: “Simplifying to the extreme, I define postmodern as incredulity toward metanarratives.”[4]

Answering the Postmodern Challenge

Postmodernism’s impact on Western culture is hotly debated, and various thinkers and writers- including those coming from a Christian worldview- have offered diverging opinions of it. Some see it as a passing fad; others see it as long-lasting paradigm shift. Some decry it as dangerously destructive; others embrace its destruction of the oppressive structures of modernity.

The most helpful contribution of postmodernism is, first, that it has successfully challenged the reigning paradigm of the modern period, which was based largely on naturalistic humanism. Modernism, in seeking to arrive at absolute knowledge through empirical investigation, separated matters of “faith” from matters of objective knowledge about the real world. Postmodernism confronts this dichotomy in ways that are helpful for the Christian worldview.

Second, postmodernism has cast a large shadow of skepticism (and has offered a strong dose of humility) on the modern belief in the efficacy and near inerrancy of human reason. As was seen during the modern period, human reason can be quite productive, especially in the arenas of science, medicine, and technology. However, human reason can also be manipulative and destructive, especially when it produces the totalizing ideologies (e.g. communism, Nazism, colonialism, etc) that characterized the modern period.

Third, postmodernism has demonstrated that objectivity and certainty are not exclusive to the realm of science as was claimed during the modern period. In fact, science is often quite biased and agenda-driven, and is therefore in no place to claim to be the final arbiter on all matters of knowledge. This is especially helpful for Christians, who often feel the burden to play by the rules of modernism and empirically demonstrate every aspect of Christian truth.

Fourth, postmodernism rightly reminds us of the power of our culture, and especially the language of our culture, in creating our frames of reference. The modern period demonstrated that this power can be used to marginalize and oppress others at the personal and the systemic level. For the Christian, then, care should be taken to distinguish Scriptural teaching from our cultural perceptions.

Finally, the emphasis of postmodernism on story and narrative fits (to a limited extent) with the way the Bible presents God’s interaction with the world. The Bible is, on the whole, a narrative through which God gives us the Truth about Himself, humanity and the world. Of course, for the postmodernist, no story is to be considered true in this absolute sense over and above any other story, and propositions from one interpretive community are irrelevant for others.

The Bible does not present a God whose story is one among many, but a God whose story is the story above all others. So, in dealing with the postmodern mind, evangelicals face a difficult situation. For the past several centuries, modernity has relegated Christianity to the category of an unscientific, unrealistic worldview that is simply not believable for thinking people. Some Christians are tempted to settle for having Christianity accepted as a truth rather than face the prospect of being dismissed due to dogmatically claiming to be the truth, and abandoning the concept of worldview seems to be a small price to pay for having at least some claim to “truth.”

Although the dethroning of humanistic scientific reason is attractive to battle-weary Christian intellectuals, the postmodern denial of all objective truth is unacceptable.

Further, it is important to note that none of the positive contributions of postmodernism originated with postmodernism! In fact, the Christian worldview has always attested to the limitations of unaided human reason, the effect of the fall on objectivity and certainty, the tendency of humans towards marginalizing others, and the role the concept of story plays in our experience.

Despite the popularity of postmodernism among many Christians, the Christian worldview and the postmodern worldview cannot co-exist without one capitulating to the other. One could argue that we are chronologically “postmodern;” but ideologically, we cannot become “postmodernists.”


[1] Immanual Kant, “An Answer to the Question ‘What is Enlightenment?’” available online at http://www-personal.ksu.edu/~lyman/ english233/Kant-WIE.htm, accessed 08/30/2009.

[2] David Wells, Above All Earthly Powers: Christ in a Postmodern World (Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdman’s, 2005), 74–90.

[3] Myron Penner, “Introduction” in Penner, Christianity and the Postmodern Turn: Six Views, 19–28.

[4] Jean Francois Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi, in Theory and History of Literature, vol. 10 (Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1984).

Jesus, Save Us From Your Followers

image

By Jay Matthews

Just had the privilege to view the documentary in selected theaters, "Jesus Save Us From Your Followers." I had an inside source allow me to see a DVD of it and have had some time to view it in sections.

Very clever movie and very impressive in terms of the visual presentation and trendy graphics.

The documentary explores the polarization of American culture over issues of faith and asks a great question: What is wrong? Why is there so much venom over such a beautiful message- the gospel of Jesus Christ?

Dan Merchant presents an excellent exploration of this caustic culture in these important areas.

I found the movie helpful in some points, but too silent on two large aspects of this issue.

First: We have lost civil dialogue in this culture. Disagreement usually means 'war'. Instead of honest debate- we hurl sound bites over the internet or through talking heads. I agree that we have lost humility and love in the message. The section of the movie (inspired by Blue Like Jazz) of Christian confession was very powerful.

Second: We are ignorant of opposing worldviews and uneducated in the trends of mainstream culture. The culture war mantra has made these issue oriented debates instead of human relationships.

I agree with these premises and, sadly, am guilty as charged.

But there are two other major problems in our presentation of the gospel.

1) We need to be more tender to the 'world' - but we have lost accountability inside the church. There is no discernible difference inside the American church and outside the American church today. We are guilty of loving the world. We have the same consumerist tendencies- we have the same divorce rate- we have the same pattern of addiction and cynicism. Our lips love Jesus, but our hearts love the world.

This problem stems from a lack of seeing sin as serious. We have preached the watered down gospel. To quote Niebur,

A God without wrath brought men without sin into a Kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a Cross.

The bad news is not bad... so the good news is not good.

2) We also stand as the most biblically illiterate generation in America. Our reading comprehension slowly dwindles and the light of the Word is dimming. I recently read a handout from C.S. Lewis to my freshman Bible class- when I finished a student said, "I didn't understand a word he said."

The purity of the church is diminishing because God's word is being eclipsed in our midst.

We should be tender to others and tough on ourselves. We need God's Spirit to convict us of sin. We need to stop posing and come clean in our sin- but we also need to move toward repentance and holiness.

One final comment- the Gospel of Christ will be offensive. Granted, it should be the only offensive part of our life as we seek to love, serve, in humility live above reproach. But if we ever think that we will live in harmony with the world.... don't be gullible.

So I come away from the movie conflicted... I want to stand for righteousness and preach forgiveness. That means drawing hard lines which will make me appear intolerant and offensive. I need to love sinners, but I cannot ignore sin.

Sin destroys.. the gospel heals. Help me Lord find the balance- help me walk in the truth. Anyone else seen this documentary? Comments? I won't be offended if you disagree!

Not So Fast: Is Technology Diminishing Our Quality of Life?

Anyone who has been reading this blog knows that I am an advocate for the appropriate and effective use of technology in our personal lives and in our schools.  I am not a Luddite.

Nevertheless, I also share the conviction that technology, like many good things in our lives, can become an obsession and a cruel master.  Any addiction, even to good things, is harmful and unbiblical whether it is sex, food, work, or technology.

I recently came across a beautifully written article by John Freeman in the Wall Street Journal.  You can read the entire article here.  If the link is broken, you can access the article in PDF format here.

Because the article is copyrighted I will not post it here but I am providing a short excerpt with the hope that you will read the entire article. 

Not So Fast (August 29, 2009) WSJ Online

… We will die, that much is certain; and everyone we have ever loved and cared about will die, too, sometimes—heartbreakingly—before us. Being someone else, traveling the world, making new friends gives us a temporary reprieve from this knowledge, which is spared most of the animal kingdom. Busyness—or the simulated busyness of email addiction—numbs the pain of this awareness, but it can never totally submerge it. Given that our days are limited, our hours precious, we have to decide what we want to do, what we want to say, what and who we care about, and how we want to allocate our time to these things within the limits that do not and cannot change. In short, we need to slow down.

Our society does not often tell us this. Progress, since the dawn of the Industrial Age, is supposed to be a linear upward progression; graphs with upward slopes are a good sign. Process­ing speeds are always getting faster; broadband now makes dial-­up seem like traveling by horse and buggy. Growth is eternal. But only two things grow indefinitely or have indefinite growth firmly ensconced at the heart of their being: cancer and the cor­poration. For everything else, especially in nature, the consum­ing fires eventually come and force a starting over.

The ultimate form of progress, however, is learning to decide what is working and what is not; and working at this pace, emailing at this frantic rate, is pleasing very few of us. It is encroaching on parts of our lives that should be separate or sacred, altering our minds and our [SLOWSIDE4]ability to know our world, encouraging a further distancing from our bodies and our natures and our communities. We can change this; we have to change it. Of course email is good for many things; that has never been in dispute. But we need to learn to use it far more sparingly, with far less dependency, if we are to gain control of our lives.

In the past two decades, we have witnessed one of the greatest breakdowns of the barrier between our work and per­sonal lives since the notion of leisure time emerged in Victorian Britain as a result of the Industrial Age. It has put us under great physical and mental strain, altering our brain chemistry and daily needs. It has isolated us from the people with whom we live, siphoning us away from real-world places where we gather. It has encouraged flotillas of unnecessary jabbering, making it difficult to tell signal from noise. It has made it more difficult to read slowly and enjoy it, hastening the already declining rates of literacy. It has made it harder to listen and mean it, to be idle and not fidget. This is not a sustainable way to live. This lifestyle of being constantly on causes emotional and physical burnout, work­place meltdowns, and unhappiness. How many of our most joyful memories have been created in front of a screen?

If we are to step off this hurtling machine, we must reassert principles that have been lost in the blur. It is time to launch a manifesto for a slow communication movement, a push back against the machines and the forces that encourage us to remain connected to them. Many of the values of the Internet are social improvements—it can be a great platform for solidarity, it rewards curiosity, it enables convenience. This is not the mani­festo of a Luddite, this is a human manifesto. If the technology is to be used for the betterment of human life, we must reassert that the Internet and its virtual information space is not a world unto itself but a supplement to our existing world, where the following three statements are self-evident …

Remember, click here to read the full article or if the link is broken, you can access the article in PDF format here.

Is Perception Reality?

By Mark Kennedy (ACSI Canada)

Every now and then I hear it, even in Christian school circles. “Perception is reality”, they say with a kind of unquestioning conviction that suggests the discovery of a new immutable truth. 

This, along with other snippets of pop business philosophy, have steadily made inroads into the board rooms of churches and Christian schools. Some are quite useful. It is not that we can’t gain insights and understanding from effective business principles and practices. The fact is that all truth, even in the area of business, is God’s truth. The problem comes when we accept any philosophical assertion without testing it against the teaching of scripture.

And that is my concern about the “Perception is reality” concept. In keeping with post modern thinking it implies that people can have their own private self-created realities –their own personal truths.

Some people reason that if only they could manipulate those perceptions effectively they would be able to get what they want –in our schools that could mean creating new pro Christian school “realities” in people’s minds.
It seems to me that the whole idea is false. We can’t have our own private versions of reality anymore than we can have our own personal definitions of truth. And Christians more than anyone should realize that truth (which is the only genuine reality) exists despite our perceptions. William Blake puts it well in his poem, The Eternal Gospel.

“Thus Life’s five windows of the soul
Distort the heavens from pole to pole,
And lead you to believe a lie
When you see with, not through the eye.”

To my thinking the final word on the subject comes from Isaiah. In chapter 11 verses 3 and 4 he contrasts the undependable nature of personal perceptions and with God’s truth.

“He will not judge by what he sees with his eye,
Or decide by what he years with his ears
But with righteousness he will judge the needy
With justice he will give decisions for the poor of the earth.”

Nuff said.